Sunday, December 27, 2009

Hospital Care and Social Media

 image

Arguments about the validity of Health 2.0 are moot. It is here!! Hundreds of thousands of patients and providers use the format in advocacy groups, using facebook, twitter, blogs, and search engines.  Is Google a health 2.0 app?

 

The following story is well worth the read

image

 

THOUGHTS ON MEDICINE AND SOCIAL MEDIA (Regina Holliday)

 

On Wednesday, May 27, 2009 I met Dr. Ted Eytan. I was invited to present a patient and caregiver view of hospitalization at a small health 2.0 meeting. I saw Powerpoint presentations with bar charts and graphs. I sat patiently taking notes about the state of ehealth and social media. At around 3:15 I spoke. I described the horror of my husband being diagnosed with cancer and of terror of not being told what was going on. I spoke about the fight we had fought to get to get a copy of the medical record. I recounted the numerous times I had used the information in his record to improve his care. The record sat upon the table in a three inch thick binder. There was silence in the room. We were no longer speaking in the abstract about patients. They asked me to focus on what was the worst thing that had happened through this entire tragedy. I told them the worst thing we experienced was lack of access to my husband’s data.

image

 

Obamism

We are hearing different reasons why we must pass this health reform bill.  1. There is a crisis and if we don't pass the bill, we will go bankrupt (things are unsustainable). 

There are many hidden aspects to this bill, which is not being discussed in a transparent manner (which our esteemed President assured us.)"that things would be different in D.C. if he were elected"

2. If  the bill is passed costs will go up as well, including increases in premiums of a significant amount to cover the new insured,, who were previously uninsurable, or excluded to due pre-existing conditions.

3. Additional taxes will go into effect several  years before any benefits or changes will be made to coverage.

"Quick, pass the bill before anyone can read it and really understand the profound effect it will have not only on health care, but every business, and person who is insured. "What will be the ripple effect on health care costs, provider availability, and hospital survival? 

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

What's In A Name

THE PUBLIC OPTION 

Let's think of some titles that will be more acceptable to the approximate 50% of voters who do not want a public option.

1. Alternative integrated universal choice for Health.

2..National Public Health, Inc. (NPH)

3.  United Stated Federal Health Reserve USFR)

4. Federal Health Insurance Bank (FHIB)

5. U.S. Health Stimulus Choice (also known as USHC certified)

6. Federal United Care Combine (also known as FUCC) (sounds like Fuc@)

Or let's allow patients to 'Opt-out of the Public Option. This would be done on a state wide basis rather than as individuals. Depending on which state you live in.  This great idea comes from those two Senators Reid and Pelosi who must smoke something for breakfast that is grown in the fields of either Afghanistan or Northern California.

Plans #1 through #4  could be funded by donations from patients who "care" for only pennies a day.

For those who want the public option....I hope you will like what you get...it won't be pretty.  If you think you can't find swine flu now, when you need it, then consider that this is typical of any government program.  The idea that the federal government is going to contract with private insurers copies what it does in most other areas of defense, manufacturing of medications such as vaccines (CDC), NASA, and others).  They cannot do the job themselves, and contract it out to others who are either not supervised or unable to perform.

Our government easily promises what it cannot or will not deliver. The war on cancer, the war on drugs.

Yes, a a physician I know it is a disgusting fact that there are many uninsured needy patients who don't get health care. I also know that programs such as medicaid will pay for a surgery, but not the necessary post op physical therapy....why? Because the states are fearful that everyone on Medi-caid will run down and sign up for chiro-massage or manipulation. That philosophy runs rampant in most state and/or federal programs.

Government programs are always trying to make a brick float.

GML

Who's in Charge, Anyway??

Physicians no longer feel in charge for many things that occur during their daily clinical work. During our training years we are carefully monitored and have mentors who we can look to for advice, guidance and in some cases, even wisdom...For those in 'private practice' in a solo or small group practice 'autonomy' becomes a real issue, and blending this with the reality of patient care, risk, and medical politics becomes a narrow balance beam for most of us.

Health reform measures are a reflection of a conundrum. Will we be reformed from within, or without??   It is a mess.  Even the informed, educated and well read can make little sense or aggregate the impact of the legislation presently being debated in congress. Driven solely by financial analysis the legislators pretend to develop a 'quality driven, consumer oriented health care policy', a real oxymoron in itself.

image

Kenneth Fisher, MD in his blog, Health Care Reform in America, states,

Dr Fisher and I are classmates and graudated from George Washington UniversitySchool of Medicine

"Indeed it takes more training to take care of seriously ill patients than to fly a jet liner. Yet it is inconceivable that a jet pilot when facing a problem, instead of using his experience and judgment, would have the passengers vote on what to do. However, unlike the pilot, in today’s medical practice it is common for physicians to place the task of medical judgment on the patient/family frequently resulting in irrational care. This often leads to patient suffering and the wasting of valuable resources.

This exaggerated sense of patient autonomy along with the fear of legal action has augmented medical consumerism. This problem has been enhanced by drug and device advertisements directly to the public and by the medical profession’s undue reliance on the legal system to decide what are, in effect, medical questions. Instead of our various medical societies forming referral mechanisms to help decide difficult issues, hospitals and doctors have abdicated this responsibility to the courts with the result being an ever-present fear of legal action.

It should be noted that till this day our medical societies have not answered this challenge. Again, in May, 1994 (New England Journal of Medicine) while discussing the Baby K court case, an encephalic baby with no chance of recovery, George J. Annas had a similar message. He commented that for medicine to avoid becoming a consumer commodity and thus unbearably expensive requiring control by payers, physicians will have to set standards and follow them. Again organized medicine did not and has not responded

A few weeks ago (November 2009) a talented second year resident told me that, in his opinion, American medicine is no longer about treating patients’ problems. It has become a hospitality industry focused on customer satisfaction regardless of the appropriateness of the medical plan.

For health care reform to be successful we have to insist that our medical societies set up procedures so that patients are treated as individuals, each with unique needs. At the same time mechanisms must be established so that we uniformly practice high quality medicine with evidence-based use of resources. We must have expanded peer review so that difficult situations and overuse can be quickly resolved using medical experts.

Dr Fisher's Interview on National Public Radio

Saturday, December 12, 2009

The Real Deal

 

It Is obvious how the world of blogging.has displaced the coffee room and the water cooler as sources of inside information. In fact, blog sources are frequently the first place that relevant information appears.

In addition to classical newspaper and Journal sources these entities have their own blog section. Add to this, facebook, twitter, digg, my space and others yet to be determined the relationships become infinite.

Take for example, this posting on ‘Dr Wes’ blog:

On Dec. 3 the U.S. Senate voted to keep significant Medicare cuts in the health-care overhaul bill despite polls showing seniors are concerned about their benefits. Senators voted 50 to 42 to reject an amendment by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. that would have stripped more than $400 billion in Medicare cuts from the health-care bill. The measure would have sent the health-care bill back to the Finance Committee for redo

What this means for our seniors is Medicare benefits will be cut in important health-care programs. In my specialty, cardiology, this will mean draconian cuts to Medicare-dependent seniors in cardiology services.

The real deal is this”

A new survey of U.S. cardiologists indicates the following:

Practice effects

* 94 percent would be forced to reduce paid staff such as nurses and technologists.

* 80 percent would be forced to cut employee benefits.

* 67 percent would elect to retire earlier than planned.

* 59 percent would limit practice hours.

* 56 percent would be forced to sell their practice and merge with a local hospital.

* 45 percent would no longer perform imaging services such as nuclear stress testing or echocardiography.

* 25 percent would be forced to close their practices.

Patient effects

* 97 percent believe that Part B costs to Medicare will increase in their area because patients will have to receive imaging tests in the hospital setting where the Medicare reimbursement rate is significantly higher than under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for private practice.

* 92 percent believe patients’ co-pays will increase as much as 20 percent if they are forced to have imaging tests done in the hospital setting.

* 89 percent believe early detection of heart disease will be greatly reduced because of patients’ lack of access to cardiology procedure services.

* 76 percent would refer patients to the nearest hospital for imaging procedures.

* 79 percent believe current Medicare patients will no longer be able to have imaging done at private practice offices and would be forced to have imaging done only at the nearest hospital.

* 45 percent would no longer be able to accept Medicare patients.

With these cuts physicians may not be able to provide the services that patients have come to depend on and in the long run, if the current policies are not changed, cardiologists may be forced to close their doors to their patients.

The law is clear — our seniors will realize these cuts unless Congress acts. We all have seen the response to government studies which want to limit mammograms to women in their 40s. You have seen the outcry to this type of foolish rationing. The Senate just voted to reverse that ruling and provide mammograms through their insurance carriers.

These Medicare cuts are the first step in Medicare rationing of our seniors’ health care. We must stop these cuts to the Medicare system. Our seniors are living longer and in better health because of the Medicare system. We can keep current Medicare benefits if fraud and abuse are eliminated. There are good-practice guidelines which have been enacted by the specialties societies. Let us enforce these practices and let Medicare survive.

On the ‘street’ it looks very different from the view at 40,000 feet.  Its about the same as President Obama receiving the Nobel Peace Prize.

Call and write to your senator today. Let him know how you his constituents feel about these proposed changes in health care.

Bottom line: The only way to get health costs down is when consumers are presented with a range of options in a truly competitive marketplace

*******************************************************

Another Observation:

Grace Marie Turner, The Galen Insitute, "More Nutty Ideas from the Senate," December 8
Two thousand seventy-four pages and trillions of dollars later, this bill doesn’t even meet the basic goal that the American people had in mind and what they thought this debate was all about: to lower costs.

Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader, December 8, on Senate Health Care Bill
It’s beginning to look like health care consumers are going to have to take lowering health care into their own hands since no answers are coming down from above. "

My own thoughts on this matter (Health Train Express)

Add to the cost of insuring additional patients, the cost  of the regulatory mechanism .  We have already witnessed this with HMOs and Medicare Advantage. Add to this the costs of    outcome analysis, preferred payment schedules for EMR usage, health information exchanges, etc and you will see that ‘savings’ are imaginary.  Keep it simple, and accountable on the local level. "

Here are ten tips for lowering your costs.
One, encourage your employer to offer a health savings account with a high deductible. Encourage the employer to pay half the deductible. Your premiums will be much lower, and your employer will save up to 50% over current HMOs and PPOs.
Two, investigate a company called Simplecare. The SimpleCare story has appeared in U.S. News & World Report, in Forbes, and on NBC News. SimpleCare , a fee-for-service organization, accepts money for medical treatment without the bother and hassle of insurance forms, co-payments, and other third-party payment related procedures. SimpleCare has an alliance of doctors offering cash discounts. Itsmembership includes 38,000 patient members working with 1,500 doctors nationwide. Discounts range from 15 percent to 50 percent for patients paying in cash.

Three, ask your doctor if he or she accepts cash only. About 10 percent of doctors accept cash only. The idea is to pay for care at the time and point of care with cash, check, or credit card without the expense or trouble of going through an insurance company. Dealing with third parties creates a 50 percent to 60 percent overhead, and many doctors are finding they can charge less and make just as much or more money without going through a third party. Often the doctor’s fee is negotiable.
Four, find out if your doctor dispenses prescriptions in the office. Prescriptions dispensed in this way average 50 percent less. A company called Physicians Total Care has installed prescription systems in 30 states and is growing by 170 percent a year. For more information, google Physicians Total Care or read a chapter “Physician Office Dispensing Stages Comeback” in my book Innovation-Driven Health Care (Jones and Bartlett, 2007).
Five, fill your prescriptions at Walmart, Target, or discount stores. Walmart has more than 300 generic drugs and 1000 over-the-counter medications it sells at $4 for a 30 day supply and $10 for a 90 day supply. Fifty percent of Americans live within 5 miles of a Walmart or Target.
Six, ask your primary care physician if he or she performs common procedures like skin biopsies, abscess drainage, joint injections in the office. An organization called the National Procedures Institute (www.npinstitute.com) has trained over 15.000 primary care doctors to perform simple office procedures, and these can be done less expensively without waiting than in a surgeon or other specialist’s office.
Seven, consider visiting a retail clinic in drug store or discount outlet for minor ailments or immunizations. Nurse practitioners using protocols and electronic medical records run these clinics, which may have physician or hospital backups. The charges are listed are transparent and predictable. About 2000 of these clinics are now operating, and their locations may be found at conveniencecareassociation.com. The services of these clinics cost about half as much as a visit to a physician’s office but do not have a physician’s expertise and may miss serious underlying conditions.
Eight, if you work for a larger employer, ask executives if they are considering setting up worksite clinics. About half of the nation’s corporations with headquarters employing more than 100 employers on site are organizing these clinics, which offer the services of a primary care physician and staff, which may include a nurse, nutritionist, and other health professionals. Employees can receive free generic drugs and other treatments or advice on site, or may be referred to cost-effective networks of specialists off-site.
Nine, if you are uninsured or underinsured consider visiting a federally-qualified community health clinic. These were launched by President Bush as a Health Centers Initiative in 2002. These clinics, which are present in all 50 states, have 4000 locations and have served 15 million people. They are administered by Health Resources and Service Admistration (HRSA. Services include checkups when well, treatments when sick, complete pregnancy care, immunizations, dental, and mental care. To find a clinic near you, google HRSA – Find a Health Center.
Ten, in general low cost and convenient care is available at a local primary care physician. There is now a shortage of these physicians. Therefore, these physicians are now very busy, and you may have to wait for an appointment. Because of low reimbursements, some no longer accept new Medicare or Medicaid patients.

·

It becomes apparent that we should not expect ‘government ‘ to fix the problem . Initiatives from patients, employers and insurance companies are far better than throwing up our hands and relying on the government(s) to solve a problem that really has nothing to do with governing, or defending our country.  It remains to be seen if patients,and employers can bring pressure to bear on insurers without governmental intervention and/or regulations.

Care for each other, your parents, your brothers and sisters, and relatives to the best of your abilities.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

A Fairy Tale

image

Bricks, Straw, or ?    This is an interesting metaphor, and it may apply well to the  current health debate.

Too big to fail? Health care reform, or Dubai?

Obama's 'glow" is diminishing, even amongst the 'faithful, and gullible.

Matt Holt and THCB quote"

There’s a big to-do about whether there are really any cost-saving measures in the House and Senate bill. Most people say that the answers are “no” and “sort of”.

But let’s not dwell on that. Instead let’s have some fun. Regular THCB readers will know that AHIP’s Karen Ignagni has told half-truth after half-truth after outright lie to protect the position of her members. All the while somehow holding together a coalition that really should have broken apart long ago (and may yet still do that). And she gets paid very well for that role.

But today in the WaPo she told the truth:"

 

Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans, said the Senate bill includes only "pilot programs and timid steps" to reform the health-care delivery system, "given the scope of the cost challenge the nation faces." Unless lawmakers institute changes across the entire system, Ignagni said in a statement Wednesday, "Health costs will continue to weigh down the economy and place a crushing burden on employers and families."

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

More Docs4Patient Care

Another rally....get involved, patients and providers alike.

Forward the link- 

Go Viral:

Meaningful Use and Incentive Payments

In one of my previous posts I alluded to this.

 

Read it here first !!

 

RECENT COMMENTS FROM IHEALTHBEAT.

MGMA Letter Details Concerns About Health IT Stimulus Funds

On Sunday, the Medical Group Management Association sent a letter to National Coordinator for Health IT David Blumenthal detailing its concerns about the implementation of the federal economic stimulus package's health IT incentive program, Modern Healthcare reports.

Under the stimulus package, health care providers who demonstrate "meaningful use" of electronic health records will qualify for increased federal incentive payments (Conn, Modern Healthcare, 11/23).

In the letter, MGMA argues that health care providers could miss out on the stimulus funds if the government fails to appropriately define meaningful use and administer the program effectively.

To avoid these pitfalls, MGMA recommended that the federal government:

  • Allow for flexibility in approaches to meaningful use;
  • Create a pilot program to test the incentive payment initiative;
  • Develop a simple process to demonstrate meaningful use;
  • Emphasize tested and widespread criteria when defining meaningful use;
  • Enable physicians to test their reporting systems prior to full implementation;
  • Focus on appropriate and achievable meaningful use criteria;
  • Monitor the health IT industry; and
  • Simplify data reporting processes.

MGMA also called on the government to encourage the health IT vendor community to develop high-quality and affordable software (Hardy, Healthcare IT News, 11/23).

Docs4Patient Care

I've been gone for a week or so on a trip to the ancestral homeland in California. (ancestral in California means longer than five years ago.)

The Docs4Patient Care movment will be very active on November 21, 2009 with chapters now in many states, including Georgia, California, Texas, as well as many other videos. Here is a 'shout out' for recent activities.

Here is a brief video:

Monday, November 23, 2009

Failed California, Failed State,Failed Health Care Reform

Undoubtedly we will see some form of compromise and legislating 'Health Care Reform".  Whether it will truly be a health care reform will be open to debate. Let's face, it seeking perfection is anathema to seeking improvement. Never let perfection obstruct improvement in the status quo. Charlie Rose interviews Friedman.

 

 

NRO, National Review Online report from Grace-Marie-Turner reflects the following.

Further, endorsements by the AARP and the American Medical Association have been largely discredited as reflecting more the narrow interest of those organizations than the will of their members.

Readers should do their part by contacting the following representatives who are most likely to influence health reform decisions.

Key Senator Contacts for Health Care ‘Reform’ Bill

State Senator D.C. Phone # D.C. Fax # State Office Phone # State Office Fax #

AR Blanche Lincoln (2010) 202 224 4843 202 228 1371 501 375 2993 501 375 7064

PA Arlen Specter (2010) 202 224 4254 202 228 1229 215 597 7200 215 597 0406

IN Evan Bayh (2010) 202 224 5623 202 2281377 317 554 0750 317 554 0760

OR Ron Wyden (2010) 202 224 5244 202 228 2717 503 326 7525 503 326 7528

LA Mary Landrieu 202 224 5824 202 224 9735 504 589 2427 504 589 4023

NE Ben Nelson 202 224 6551 202 228 0012 402 441 4600 402 391 4725, 402 476 8753

ND Kent Conrad 202 224 2043 202 224 7776 701 232 8030 701 232 6449

DE Tom Carper 202 224 2441 202 228 2190 302 573 6291 302 573 6434

CO Michael Bennet (2010) 202 224 5852 202 228 5036 303 455 7600 303 455 8851

CA Barbara Boxer (2010) 202 224 3553 202 224 0454 213 894 5000 202 224 0357

AR Mark Pryor 202 224 2353 202 228 0908 501 324 6336 501 324 5320

CO Mark Udall 202 224 5941 202 224 6471 303 650 7820 303 650 7827

CT Joe Lieberman (Indpndt) 202 224 4041 202 224 9750 860 549 8463 860 549 8477

VA Mark Warner 202 224 2023 202 224 6295 804 775 2314 804 775 2319

VA Jim Webb 202 224 4024 202 228 6363 804 771 2221 804 771 8313

MT Jon Tester 202 224 2644 202 224 8594 406 449 5401 406 449 5462

VE Bernard Sanders (Indpndt)202 224 5141 202 228 0776 800 339 9834 802 860 6370

MO Claire McCaskill 202 224 6154 202 228 6326 314 367 1364 314 361 8649

ME Olympia Snowe (Rep) 202 224 5344 202 224 1946 207 874 0883 207 874 7631

ME Susan Collins (Rep) 202 224 2523 202 224 2693 207 780 3575 207 828 0380

To obtain all the required contact information for these senators, go to www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/ (put this address in your favorites). When you are on the home page, just click the link Find who represents you in Congress. Go to the state of interest and you quickly get the information on every Representative and Senator by clicking on their respective state. You can copy and paste their office address in Washington, D.C. and their home district or state into your letters (with adjustments in fonts) and obtain or check their email addresses and the phone and fax numbers.

Compose your letters (cutting and pasting, inserting correct addresses, names, etc.) and fax them out! www.myfax.com is a quick, easy and inexpensive service for sending many faxes quickly by email, not fax machine!!!

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Sunday Morning Bonus

Corruption in American Health Care

Saving Health Care, Saving America as written  By BRIAN KLEPPER, DAVID C. KIBBE, ROBERT LASZEWSKI and ALAIN ENTHOVEN in The Health Care Blog

"So far, Congress' response to the health care crisis has been alarmingly disappointing in three ways. First, by willingly accepting enormous sums from health care special interests, our representatives have obligated themselves to their benefactors' interests rather than to those of the American people. More than 3,330 health care lobbyists - six for every member of Congress - contributed more than one-quarter of a billion dollars in the first and second quarters of 2009. A nearly equal amount has been contributed on this issue from non-health care organizations. This exchange of money prompted a Public Citizen lobbyist to comment, "A person can reach no other conclusion than this is a quid pro quo [this for that] activity."

Continue reading "Saving Health Care, Saving America"

It goes further down hill from there.

This article should give every physician a gut wrenching reaction, if not disgust at the corruption which has become rationalzied and rampant in some parts of the country.  It  points out how immorality creeps in slowly and devours a system. I reacted to the article in such a manner. From personal experience in such an environment I can describe how market influences alter perception and actions in order to survive in such a market. The financial imperatives create overwhelming features which can only be avoided if the overall physician community reacts appropriately in unison rather than in self interest.   Beyond this the only moral choice for the individual physician is to leave that community (which in itself strengthens the hand of the 'cartel'.

In a second article on The Health Care Blog  By JEFF GOLDSMITH

Atul Gofigure: Why McAllen Should Have Mattered in the Health Reform Debate

 

image

Back in June, Atul Gawande, a Harvard trained surgeon, published a riveting article in the New Yorker   about the physician community in McAllen Texas.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

The Public Option

The AHIP  Singers

Thanks to The Health Care Blog for publishing this musical dedicated to the public option (not).

 

This is much more fun and better sung than traditional protests!

That is my humor for today. 

The following story is well worth the read

Saturday, October 24, 2009

The Mike Gallagher Show....watch out Hannity

I just had to include this as a blog post...

image

 

Hal Scherz is just one of the many willing to  get down and invest his own capital in growing our grass roots efforts to influence health reform.  This is one of those things our organizations just cannot do as well.  Your interest,contributions and participation are essential.

As Dr Scherz states:

""I know how much everyone enjoys opening my TNTC emails (LOL) and I'm sure that you must have wondered where I disappeared to. I was down most of this week with what I'm convinced was H1N1, although the ER wouldn't test me. (A taste of what we have to look forward to under Obamacare). Now that I'm strong enough to sit up, I can start bothering everyone again. If you had any emails bounce back, please resend them. My box was filled up because I didn't clean it out for 5 days. If you sent me an email in the last few days, I promise that I will read it over the next 48 hours.

There are 2 things that I wanted to address tonight. As I have indicated to everyone, Docs 4 Patient Care will be an embedded sponsor of the Mike Gallagher show.

image

This is more like a partnership, because he has a strong, personal reason for wanting the doctor-patient relationship to be protected. Please begin to go to Mike's web site (http://www.mikeonline.com/) beginning on Monday and you will see Docs 4 Patient Care featured prominently. The exciting news regarding this, is that Mike is doing a 3 hour healthcare show this Thursday, Oct 29, and his co-host will be Hal Scherz. Yes, you didn't misread this. We will be discussing every aspect of the healthcare debate and we will try to have a guest or 2 to help to clarify the issues. His show is predominantly an audience participation show, so it would be a great opportunity for everyone to try to call in and to say what you would like to his national audience. If you are not familiar with his show, find out online which station his show is broadcast on in your area. It might even be a good idea to put this show on in your office waiting room and see if the hospitals will put this through into the doctors' lounges.

The second other important issue that I wanted to cover has to do fundraising. Please don't stop reading- this is different than usual.

I have received feedback from people that I have known professionally for over 20 years who I have reached out to in different parts of the country. When they heard about what we were putting together and that my practice was so committed, that we were putting up $40,000 in seed money, it was a "no brainer" for them. However, they are trying to convince people that they work with in their communities to dig into their pockets and write big checks. They are a bit reluctant because they don't know us, and they aren't sure where their money is going.

These are fair questions and concerns. First, let me assure everyone, that as a not for profit 527 political corporation, everything that we collect and spend has to be above board and transparent. If any member has any questions, they can contact our treasurer and board member, Joanne Thurston, who is a CPA.

Another question was whether I or any of the other officers have received any compensation. I wish. The truth is that not only do we not receive compensation, but we continue to put up our own money without asking for reimbursement for business related items- business cards, signs, etc. We have been to Washington twice already, and use our own money for these trips. And except for the past 4 days that I have taken off because of illness, I have averaged 5 hours of work daily for the past 5 months without any compensation. Anyone who sees what time the majority of my emails are timed can attest to this.

As to where does the money go? Well, there were start up expenses which we won't go into. But there are ongoing costs every month- mostly web site maintenance and our PR team. There are intermittent costs such as legal, marketing, other consultants.

However, we are now ready for prime time. We either move to the next level or pack up our toys and go home. What this means is that we spend a large amount of money getting out our message on a national platform and on a regular basis. This will open up more doors to us than we can possibly even imagine at this point. We need to hire an executive director, who will help to take the burden off of me. There are still many large initiatives that we need to launch, such as putting together the thousands of newsletter recipients who are not doctors and whose energy and enthusiasm is being wasted. We need to get these people working for us and contributing to our cause. The same for the allied health care professionals. There are thousands of doctors that we could get into Docs 4 Patient Care. We are poised for explosive growth. We need help to make this happen. We would like to at some point hire our own lobbyists and this will be very expensive. And there is so much more than this.

So this is where the money is going. Most of you getting this email don't know me at all, although there are ways to check on people today that didn't exist in the past. However, I think that it is worth taking a flier on this one. Do you want to write a big check in hopes that your money will actually work for you, or do you want to pretend that everything will be ok and hope that if you play nice and don't make too much noise, that you'll be left alone? This is almost too insulting to even ask this question.

Enough tonight. But those who want to contribute but just aren't sure, just do it! ""

All the best

Hal

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

The Arrow through Your Head

image

I have taken a break from health reform politicking to return to some essentials about health IT.

” The definition of a pioneer is “the guy with the arrow through his head.”

This was just one of the 'takeaways" at a recent seminar hosted in San Diego regarding the IT stimulus money train.

 

  • The feds have not defined “meaningful user” or “certified” yet; they are key requirements of the plan.

    image

    MEANINGFUL USER IS IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER. ONLY PART OF THE DEFINITION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, AND NOT BY THE USERS THEMSELVES....TIME WILL TELL WHICH AND WHAT IS MEANINGFUL AND IT MAY TURN OUT THAT MEANINFUL (DEFINITION) WILL CHANGE IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.

    ARE WE GOING TO BE CAST INTO A USELESS MOLD?

    image

  • Financial incentives, even the full $44,000 available, are not going to cover your investment.
  • The cost difference between implementing in 2012 versus 2011 is only $5,000 less (paid out over 5 years). That year could be huge. The definition of an early adopter is the “bug on the windshield of progress.” The definition of a pioneer is “the guy with the arrow through his head.” One year to let others make the mistakes may save you much more than $5,000.

    WHY ARE THE FEDS IN SUCH A HURRY WITH CUT OFF DATES AND PENALTIES FOR NOT IMPLEMENTING HIT AND EHR BY 2012???

    image

    COULD IT BE THAT THE FEDS ARE IN BED WITH SOME BIG IT PLAYERS???  ALLSCRIPTS IS BUSY RUNNING NATIONAL SEMINARS ON 'HOW TO" (DIP INTO THE FEDERAL TREASURY)

    DON'T SPEND MY MONEY!!!

  • If you implement a bad process, you still have a bad process. Now is the time to dig into your operations, make them better, and THEN automate.
  • There are four “I”s that are key in shopping for an EHR/EMR:
    • Implementation—This is the hardest part; it can sink you, and the vendors may not there for the long haul.
    • Identity—How are you going to secure your data? Big penalties for doing it badly.
    • Interoperability—Will it work with a MAC, your hardware, your PM system?
    • Intersection—Will it work with the hospital/s, or the IPA/s, or any other of the as-yet-unnamed entities that will be required? THANKS TO MODERN MEDICINE, AND JUDY BEE
    • Monday, October 19, 2009

      Medical BlogWorld New Media Expo

      If you missed it, here it is. Excerpts from Las Vegas and the Blog World New Media Expo.

      I regret not being able to be there. 

      Wednesday, October 14, 2009

      Prudent Buyers-not another insurance company

      from: iHealthbeat

       


      Quote of the Day:
      Intelligence without ambition is a bird without wings.
      --C. Archie Danielson

      MGMA: Many Physician Groups Not Yet Ready To Invest in EHRs

      Many physician group practices are likely to delay electronic health record adoption because of logistical and financial concerns, experts said this week at the Medical Group Management Association's annual convention, Healthcare IT News reports.

      MGMA represents 22,500 medical group administrators and managers from across the country.

      Robert Tennant, senior policy adviser for MGMA, said most of the physician practices MGMA represents will not qualify by 2011 for incentive payments under the federal economic stimulus package.

      Under the stimulus package, health care providers who demonstrate "meaningful use" of EHRs will qualify for incentive payments through Medicare and Medicaid. However, the federal government has yet to issue a final definition for meaningful use.

      William Jessee, CEO of MGMA, said many physician practices experienced declining revenue in 2008. He noted that nearly 37% of MGMA members have said they are postponing capital expenditures, which could include EHR adoption (Healthcare IT News, 10/13).

      Moreover, many physician groups are concerned that the federal government will reduce Medicare payment rates this year under its sustainable growth rate formula, Jessee said.

      He added that uncertainty about the rate reductions is leading many medical groups to delay EHR implementation (Monegain, Healthcare IT News, 10/13).

      It seems as if many physicians are reticent to spend money they do not have. (unlike our federal government).  Despite all the rhetoric and politically incorrect statements about how much HEALTH IT will save, the government programs will have physicians lay out the funds to start up the  HIT transition and will only  receive grants if they can prove they are using EMR effectively (meaningfully) and according to a standard which has yet to be defined by them. The deadline is 2011 for implementation.  This is less than one  year from the probably final passage of any health reform bill. Although the original stimulus funding took place several months ago, the reality of these funds filtering down to the medical community will take at least another 12 months, based upon previous experience with ARRA and other stimulus packages.

      Tuesday, October 13, 2009

      Care---DENIED!!!


      Quote of the Day:


      An argument is the longest distance between two points of view.
      --Dan Bennett

      The Terminator

      Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed AB 2 over the weekend, rejecting legislation that would put a stop to the insurance industry's outrageous practice of wrongfully canceling patients' coverage once they get very sick and run up large medical bills, the Los Angeles Times and other major papers report. Sponsored by the California Medical Association, AB 2 called for an independent review of decisions by insurers to rescind coverage.

      The insurance industry's widespread abuse of the practice has drawn condemnation from Republicans and Democrats alike.

      In June, a congressional investigation found that three insurers had rescinded coverage for 20,000 patients over five years, saving their companies $300 million.

      "With this veto, the Governor told Californians that insurance company profits are more important than their access to health care when they get sick and treatment becomes costly," said Dev GnanaDev, CMA president. "Without the patient protections of legislation like AB 2, there is no guarantee that Californians will have health insurance when they need it most."


      Dev GnanaDev, president of the California Medical Assn., said Schwarzenegger's veto told Californians that "insurance company profits are more important than their access to healthcare."
      Insurance firms and business leaders countered that the bill proposed unnecessary regulation and would have hurt the state's economic recovery.

      File:Arnold Schwarzenegger - I'll be back.jpg

       

      Why did Governor Schwarzenegger terminate this bill?

       Read on about the current federal legislation unfolding.....He punted this one over to the U.S. Congress, and maintained ties with the insurance industry, who wield a lot of power  in California, besides health insurance.

       

      SENATE PASSES HEALTH BILL  (FINANCE)

      Monday, October 12, 2009

      AMERICAN HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS

      A.H.I.P. for short, dropped a last minute 'bomb'.

      This it !    A.H.I.P. chose to announce their disfavor on a Monday morning, which also happens to be a Federal Holiday.  It also came just after the latest media news cycle closed.  Scouring my blog list I did not see any mention of this perfidity of the AHIP.

      I seem to remember several months ago how the head of Wellpoint announced how they were cooperating with the reform plans.  What happened?  Perhaps they don't like the idea of offering coverage to the uninsured, the sick and ill, and whoever else they can't make a buck off of.

      Deep in the recesses of their accounting departments they have now estimated that the reform measures proposed by the Senate Finance Committee would increase a family's premiums by 4500 dollars/year. I guess what they are saying is "Sure, we'll participate in reform, but it's going to cost 4500 dollars/year for most families. " GIVE US A BREAK !

      Sunday, October 11, 2009

      Reconciliation- Health Reform

      Walt Whitman writing during the civil war penned this poem about irreconciliable differences, and how they can lead to destruction.  (This puts in proper perspective the current tone of health  politic)

      Reconciliation

      By Walt Whitman

      1819-1892



      Word over all, beautiful as the sky,
      Beautiful that war and all its deeds of carnage must in time be
      utterly lost,
      That the hands of the sisters Death and Night incessantly softly
      wash again, and ever again, this solid world;
      For my enemy is dead, a man divine as myself is dead,
      I look where he lies white-faced and still in the coffin--I draw near,
      Bend down and touch lightly with my lips the white face in the coffin.

       

      Saturday, October 10, 2009

      Contact your Representatives

       

      Keep an eye out for a link to Healthtrain's new audio blogcast, soon to be replaced with a video blogcast.

      I hope you have all been busy writing to your representatives about your opinon on health reform.  Reading the media makes one question the accurateness of what is being reported.

      The Secret Meetings

      The Imperial Senate

      Voting for Healthcare Reform before voting against it.

      America's Health Future Act  Read this important document.

      And after reading it see: 

      Grassfire.org

       

      There are several web sites to help you contact your senator and/or congressman, and others who are key players in health  reform.

      Wednesday, October 7, 2009

      Health 2.0 Conference ver 3.0

      I wanted to take a brief moment before I dash off to Health 1.0. Today marks the beginning of Health 2.0 in San Francisco. For t hose you who don't know what this is I refer you to Health2.0

      Some interesting observations by Matthew Holt of  The HealthCare Blog.

      What is Health 1.0 ?  It's the mess you are going to face in your office today, doctor.  I don't have to elaborate on it here. I hope you have a good day.

      Meanwhile on capitol hill, things seem to have quieted down. The polls show a definite shift toward the Obama Plan (whatever that is)....The devil is in the details.  With the  recent outcry in August,  hopefully our elected representatives are reading the bill and having attorneys interpret congressional legalese.  The federal register will never be the same.

      WASHINGTON (AP) - The fever has broken. The patient is out of intensive care. But if you're President Barack Obamayou can't stop pacing the waiting room. Health care...image

      Thanks to all of you...to the Todd Rubins, Scott Barbours, and Hal Scherz.....who participated and led the Million Med March last week.  We haven't heard anything from the doctors at the White House Rose Garden Tea Party, as yet. 

      image

      As you may know these docs were all fervent supporters of Obama's campaign for President.  Not much dissent there, and a safe bet for no demonstrations on the White House lawn. This was a real dog and pony show and a definite chance to land an autograph photo for that office wall.

      Monday, October 5, 2009

      Rose Garden at the White House

      It’s Monday morning at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue (The White House). President Obama has invited physician leaders to attend a meeting today regarding healthcare reform.

      So, what is the agenda? There may be a hint of what will take place in an article in Medpage Today, describing Mr. Obama’s vision for health reform in America.

      Here are President  Obama's  takeaway points:

      "I don't believe malpractice reform is a silver bullet, but I have talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs. So I am proposing that we move forward on a range of ideas about how to put patient safety first and let doctors focus on practicing medicine. I know the Bush administration considered authorizing demonstration projects in individual states to test these issues. It's a good idea, and I'm directing my Secretary of Health and Human Services to move forward on this initiative today."

      "The only thing this plan would eliminate [in Medicare] is the hundreds of billions of dollars in waste and fraud, as well as unwarranted subsidies in Medicare that go to insurance companies ..."

      To date, the White House has detailed hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to the Medicare program. First, the administration outlined $634 billion in savings, about half of which would come from cuts to Medicare and Medicaid. These include elimination of overpayment to Medicare Advantage plans.

      And insurance companies will be required to cover, with no extra charge, routine checkups and preventive care, like mammograms and colonoscopies -- because there's no reason we shouldn't be catching diseases like breast cancer and colon cancer before they get worse. That makes sense, it saves money, and it saves lives

      There are those who claim that our reform effort will insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false. The reforms I'm proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally"

      "Some of people's concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost. The best example is the claim ... that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. It is a lie, plain and simple."

      I know I will sleep much better tonight after our physician leaders meet with President Obama, knowing that our healthcare reform has been solved…

      Did the Whitehouse Cherry-Pick the physicians who were invited to the Rose Garden??

      President Obama makes remarks on the need for health insurance reform with doctors from across the country.

      Physician's for Obama

      All supporters of President Obama who campaigned for his election

      WHO WERE THE GATE-CRASHERS?

      Another not as well known meeting today is the 

      NATIONAL PHYSICIAN'S ALLIANCE PROGRAM

      National Grand Rounds on Health Care Reform
      Monday, October 5, 2009 12:00 PM Eastern

      The meeting was held today at Columbus Square at Union Station.

      To see the meeting WEBINAR, click on WEBINAR.

      The meeting was sponsored by the AMSA (American Medical Student Association, and the  National Physician's Allliance Program.

      Panelists included:

      image 

      Arthur Kellerman, MD,MPH Dean for Health Policy, Emory University.

      image

      Meena Seshamani, PhD, MD
      Director of Policy Analysis,
      Office of Health Reform,
      Director of Health & Human Services

      The takeaway from both of these meetings is that we have 'their ear'. 

      Physician involvement is critical, and now more than ever before, we are being heard.....WE must continue to be involved on a daily basis as legislation is developed.

      Sunday, October 4, 2009

      Docs 4 Patient Care

      The rest of the story.....October 1 has come and gone. The group had another successful day barnstorming the capitol building. Hal, Scott and Todd as well as many other members of Docs4Patient Care started  their own filibuster and nearly shut down several senator's and other congressional offices.  I spoke with Senator Joe Lieberman's office and they too were being 'lobbied' by our group as well as many other individual physicians.

      The alliance of providers and patient advocacy is a powerful platform for patients and physicians.

      Docs4PATIENTCARE.ORG 

      202-456-1414

      "Some of you may recognized this telephone number", states Congressman Tom Price MD R-                         . "It' the White  House"

      Here is what he is asking us to do:

      1. CALL THE WHITE HOUSE ON MONDAY! The President is meeting with a hand
      picked group of docs who agree with him. He needs to hear from doctors in
      the community who disagree with him.  CALL ON MONDAY TO: 

      202-456-1414

      2. Encourage your Physician Colleagues to do the same. Forward this email to:
      your medical associations, post the phone number of doctor dining room, bulletin boards and talk to your colleagues in the corridor.

      3. ENCOURAGE YOUR PATIENTS TO CALL THE WHITE HOUSE TO SAY “NO TO MANDATES, RATIONING, and THE PUBLIC OPTION”.

       

      Here is what POLITICO has to say

       

      An interesting point of view.  Socialize Property Insurance, but not Health Insurance.

       

      Matthew Holt of The Health Care Blog makes this point in a recent post.

      Thursday, October 1, 2009

      The Accelerator, or What's new in HIT

      Advancing consumer-centric
      health care by driving integration
      of technology and the consumer experience across a network of
      new and established technology companies and health care
      organizations.

      Quite a mouthful, what is this all about?

      Health 2.0 Accelerator

      Big words, bigger hopes, or just more smoke and mirrors?

      Perhaps fueled by Stimulus funds.....

      Free HICO scores online !!

      What do credit card blogs have to do with health insurance? Read on at  Credit card forum (the blog)

      Perhaps one of the new regulations in health reform will be a HICO score that parallels your FICO score.  Or perhaps we need a 'truth in health insurance "  law that parallels the 'truth in lending " law.

      Check your HICO score monthly , clean up your health  !

      Sick people, need not apply!

      Tuesday, September 29, 2009

      Million Med March October 1, 2009

      Docs 4

      PATIENT CARE

      Ok everyone, we are on the eve of our second big trip to Washington.

      It will never be perfect, but as good as it was for everyone last time, I expect that this one will be even better, because we learned a lot from last time and we'll be a bit more organized, I hope.

      Enclosed are suggested talking points. Remember, they are SUGGESTED talking points. You can add your own to the list if you think that there is something missing. Please don't ask us to redo this with your point that we left out. 20 doctors can come up with 21 different talking point lists. This list encompasses 95% of the things that we all seem to agree about.

      We have some appointments set up. The Congressmen and Senators know about us and word has gotten around about the last trip and this one. The appointments are a bit more scarce this time as a result. Nonetheless, we will go to their offices and try to get in to see them or their chief of staff or their healthcare team.

      I have a list of people coming who emailed me. I do not want to put people's names on a mass mailing to confirm that you are coming. So, I'm going to ask anyone coming to just shoot a 1 line email to me today to confirm that we have you on our list. The reason for this, is because we've divided the docs that we have into 4 lobbying groups and we want to make sure that we have you. If you would prefer to be on your own (not advised), then don't bother replying.

      All docs will meet in the plaza in front of the Capitol steps at 9:00AM and we will break into groups. There is one exception, the organizers of the Million med March have a 9:00 meeting and I will send a separate email to them about meeting earlier.

      We will meet with Congressmen and Senators until about 11:15 and then head over to John MArshall PArk for the Million Med Rally and March.

      We will then meet with Congressmen again after the march.

      The weather forecast looks good for Thursday- high of 70, and clear.

      REMEMBER THAT EVERYONE SHOULD COME WEARING SCRUBS AND WHITE COATS. THIS IS FOR REAL!!. It makes for an impressive show, and that is why we are all taking the time off from our lives to come to Washington. I'm looking forward to seeing all of you there.

      Hal

      Hal Scherz MD

      President, Docs 4 Patient Care

      www.docs4patientcare.org

      Letter to Congressmen and Senators:

      clip_image001

      TALKING POINTS FOR CONGRESSIONAL LOBBYING

      1. There is no need to rush a bill through just to satisfy a political promise. Healthcare reform needs to be thought out and done carefully. There is only one chance to do this correctly.

      2. The problem with healthcare isn’t the care. It is the best care in the world. The quality of US healthcare and the outcomes are being unfairly attacked so that the system can be changed.

      3. There are solutions that have been offered to address problems in a targeted fashion that Congress and the White House are not listening to.

      4. Access to health insurance is a problem for 15-20 million US citizens. This can be addressed immediately with insurance vouchers and tax credits utilizing the current private insurers.

      5. Cost of healthcare insurance is high and needs to come down. This can be done by promoting competition. First by repealing the antitrust exemption that insurance companies operate under (McCarron- Fergusson Act) and by relaxing restrictions on internet sales of healthcare insurance across state lines.

      6. Eliminate pre-existing conditions by expanding risk pools and establishing high risk pools.

      7. Allow people to purchase their own insurance and receive the same tax breaks as employers. This will uncouple insurance from the workplace and make it portable.

      8. Push for Health Savings Accounts to make people better consumers of healthcare resources, which would drive costs down. Other ways to drive costs down would be to have doctors and hospitals post fees so that patients could shop. Eliminate antitrust regulations, Stark regulations, and many other government regulations on doctors which actually drive healthcare costs up.

      9. Medical Liability Reform- specialty boards to decide on the merits of cases before they go to trial. Caps on awards, loser pays for frivolous lawsuits.

      10. No government run or sponsored health insurance program (public option, coops, insurance exchange, triggers, mandates)

      11. No government oversight board determining medical decisions

      12. The AMA does not represent the majority of practicing US doctors- only 17% belong to the AMA and most of these are retired, practice academic medicine, are in administration, or are residents and students

      13. Our #1 priority is the health and well being of our patients- your constituents (when talking to elected officials)

      Monday, September 28, 2009

      Million Med March

       

       Put this on your schedule:  October 1, 2009 in Washington, D.C.

      An Interview with Hal Scherz, MD a Pediatric Urologist. Hal Scherz practices in Atlanta, Georgia..

      image

      Hal has taken the bold step of forming a grass roots organization to link individual physicians and groups with patient advocacy groups to visit congressional representatives (U.S. Sentate, and House of Representatives) during the Health Reform debate and afterward.

      The organization is ‘DOCS4PATIENTCARE.ORG ‘. The organization also goes by the same name.

      Health Train: Hal, tell me about docs4patientcare .

      Dr. Scherz: I decided to form a group that would go to Washington DC for the   "White Coats to Congress Rally "   during the initial march in early September 2009. It was an amazing experience to see so many physicians motivated and willing to take a day from their busy schedule to attend the event.

      Health Train: What did you experience at the ‘march’?

      Dr Scherz: Several things,

      1. We individual physicians have gained an audible voice in the debate and decision making process.

      2. Physicians are now willing to participate in grassroots activities outside the cloak of organized medicine.

      3. Many physicians do not feel that the AMA or other specialty organizations represent them adequately.

      4. The power of individuals is greater than the power collectively of our organizations.

      5. Patient advocacy groups and individuals have a greater effect when united in this common goal of insuring that the doctor patient relationship is maintained and strengthened.

      6. The people we met in D.C were not political activists, nor radicals. They are ordinary Americans with a passionate message about health reform and the dangers of governmental control and/or intervention in the health process.

      Health Train: Where do you go from here?

      Dr Scherz:

      Our most immediate goal is to gather another group to travel to Washington DC for the ‘Million Med March”. On October 10, 2009.

      Health Train: What groups are you affiliated with?

      None. We are independent and have no political allegiances or agenda other than making the individual physician’s voices heard.

      Health Train: Where are your Chapters?

      Dr Scherz: Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Indiana, Phoenix, Baltimore, New York

      Health Train: How do I join?, Is this a PAC?

      Dr Scherz: No, it is not a PAC. You can go to our website: www.docs4patientcare.org to register. We are not a PAC. We merely encourage individuals and empower their activities.

      Health Train: When is the next “Event”?

      The next ‘Event”   The Million Med March"  will take place on October 10,2009 in Washington, DC. Details will be posted on the website, www.docs4patientcare.org

      image

      Health Train: Can I form my own chapter in my area?

      Dr Scherz: Yes ,by all means, we are encouraging joining local chapters or forming your own chapter

      Healht Train: Do you want to add anything else?

      Dr. Scherz: We are an organization searching for passionate and articulate physicians to go to Washington D.C. and possibly have the opportunity to speak on a national forum regarding pending health reform legislation.

      Health Train:   Thank you Dr Scherz....we'll see you in Washington on the  1st  of October.

      For more information go to  www.docs4patientcare.org

      Saturday, September 26, 2009

      More 'free' Things..

      Health IT continues to be in the limelight of health reform. And there is a great deal of scrambling to obtain a share of the stimulus IT funding passed by congress this year.

      Two cardiologists from Johns Hopkins University , David Meyerson and Sammy Zakira elaborate in the Washington Post a typical frustrating encounter for the majority of physicians who are confronted by a seriously ill patient and an unobtainable coherent medical history. Both of these physicians attend patients at the VA Hospitals in Baltimore, MD.

      They write, "Most currently available electronic medical record software is unwieldy and difficult to quickly access, and there is still no vehicle for the timely exchange of critical medical data between providers and facilities." The cardiologists note that the federal stimulus package included about $50 billion for health IT, but they argue that "it will be difficult and costly to construct new systems ensuring interoperability of all current hospital software."

      This does not address the issues of outpatient clinical care, which have a far greater number of clinical encounters.

      The VA system has been using VISTA as their EMR. They advocate for the adoption of the VA VISTA system as the backbone for EMR in the United States. They also suggest that any other EMRs be interoperable with the VA system. Both of these suggestions enjoy considerable merit for several reasons.

      1. It is a proven stable platform

      2. It has been used by many or most physicians during training.

      3. It is ‘free’. This is not entirely accurate. The program itself is free of charge, but does require some expertise in tweaking it for the underlying operating system. The operating system is somewhat arcane and no longer in popular demand.

      4. There is a pool of IT specialists familiar with the system that can be ‘tapped’ for implementing the system and training it’s users.

      5. The suggestion that other systems be interoperable with VISTA is a good one. The standard is there….and it works! This eliminates the controversy about which standard will be adopted. There are several competing certification organizations in play at this time. This will cause delays and perhaps avoid further confusion should several different regional standards emerge.

      6. VISTA is scalable.

      7. The taxpayers have already invested considerable ‘billions of dollars’ in this system.

      The negatives are:

      1. VISTA is not well designed for independent practitioners, or small group practices.

      2. It bears the perhaps unwarranted ‘stigma’ of being a government computer system, with real and/or imagined prejudices against such a system. Such as the Post Office.

      3. It is an ‘older system’ designed more than 15 years ago, with multiple ‘patches’.

      He's Back

       

      Most of us realize that our government in D.C. has been out of control for over a decade (perhaps much longer).

      According to this interview with Pete Stark, Congressman from California it makes sense that the more debt the government has, the wealthier the country is.

       

        I am not certain of the rationale of this statement but perhaps it alludes to the ability of our government to borrow money reflects upon our income, ability and willingness to make payments on that debt.  In October 2008 we came to an abrupt ending to that rhetoric.  The past 12 months are a witness to the failure of that economic model .  We shall call that "Pete Stark Economics".  Perhaps in 30 years or so Mr. Stark will be the Nobel Prize winner in Economics.  However I am not holding my breath,

      The Uninsured Patient

      One of the greatest frustrations for any physician in the U.S. is the "uninsured patient".  Coming face to face with one of the 'forgotten' patients can ruin an entire day of work. Knowing how to help a patient and being totally powerless to do so ranks right up there with an announced audit from the IRS and/or a letter from a plaintiff's attorney that you are about to get your a-- sued.

      In fact what has evolved in most practice offices is a highly refined  filtering mechanism to keep these patients away from you, the physician.  This vicious and exclusionary process developed without any forethought as a means to insure the financial survival of our present health system.  It flies in the face of what  physicians are really all about....caring for people.

      In order to see a physician you must be a 'card carrying" patient or have a wad of cash (which is rapidly evolving into a wad of plastic bits and bytes, or a wheelbarrow)  At any rate the 'plastic card' now carries more power that one could have ever imagined.

      At one time it did not matter, doctors and hospitals could and did give away millions of dollars of care because they  were compensated fairly and sufficiently.  Even if ph ysicians gave away their services (which is a small percentage of total health care costs) the patient could not access lab work, imaging services, nor have access to medications.

      THE MILLION MED MARCH

       

      JOIN THE MARCH!!!

       

       

      "I'm tired, mad as hell, and just not going to take it anymore," says Richard Chudacoff, MD, a gynecologist from Las Vegas. "I am going to Washington, DC. At noon, on Thursday, October 1, 2009, I will be on the Mall with a few other physicians."

      How many times have YOU thought or even muttered this under your breath??

      "We simply decided that we will not work that day and perhaps the day before and maybe even the day afterward," says Dr. Chudacoff. "Perhaps we will show the country that physicians are worth more than a $5 copay; that physicians are more important than a mid-level healthcare worker; and that our profession is needed, our services are required, and our practice is a calling to be respected, not a trade that is to be negotiated to the lowest bidder.

      A letter posted by Dr. Chudacoff on www.obgyn.net in June has been spreading like wildfire across the Internet, finding its way to personal blogs, discussion groups, and professional forums.

      On July 10, an MPC contributor and one of the supporters of the Million Med March launched a Website, www.millionmedmarch.com, to build support for the October event.

       

      A  TOWNHALL MEETING IN FREMONT CALIFORNIA WITH DEMOCRAT, PETE STARK .

       

      Some images from the March of September 10th,2009,AND THERE WILL BE ANOTHER GATHERING ON OCTOBER 1, 2009.

       

      image image image 

      image

      image

      image image

      Don't forget...be there on October 1, 2009

      Join the March:

      Tuesday, September 22, 2009

      The Medicare Value Index

      Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., has advanced this proposal as part of her Medicare Payment Improvement Act, and it is now at the center of the Senate's discussion on how to craft health care reform.

      The value index would penalize Medicare providers that spend above the national average and reward providers that spend below the national average with more funding. The idea is to raise the quality of health care and encourage efficiency, but in reality it will undercut those with the greatest health care needs, namely the poor and minorities.

      By failing to consider major factors driving regional spending differences, the value index is not what proponents make it out to be. Consider this: The average monthly rent in San Mateo is $1,658 while it's $873 in Minneapolis. Salaries for medical support staff are considerably higher in California than in Midwestern states. None of that is reflected in the value index's calculation. So absent any other factors, the proposal would direct more funding to places with a lower cost of doing business, which has nothing to do with the quality or efficiency of medical treatment.

      A version of the value index is part of the health care reform plan unveiled Wednesday by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. (The House's health care reform bill, HR 3200, would commission a study on Medicare's spending differences and consider what to do about them at a later date.)

      (these studies have been done, and are already available from previous medicare data)

      Sunday, September 20, 2009

      OBAMA LIES??

       

      A few simple solutions:  Are we up to it?

       

      From the California Health Care Foundation: Another simple solution.

      Gubernatorial Candidate Campbell Offers Health Plan for California

      OBAMA   LIES??     or perhaps to put it more gently, HE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT.

      Recently in MedPolitics,     EvanMadianosMD    -discuses's the producers of health care.

      The largest problem in our health cares system is....the uninsured. 

      Physicians when they come across uninsured patients feel great angst that they cannot order tests, or do appropriate indicated procedures for a patient.  This perhaps is the greatest stress of today's medicine.  This is the reason many physicians chose to work for the VA, Military System,,, or large prepaid groups such As Kaiser Permanente, the patients are pre screened already and there is no doubt for the physicians that they will be able to provide quality care.

      Lumping our present health system into the  supposed evils of capitalism, greed and avarice does a great disservice to all physicians and hospitals.  We have been thrown into an atmosphere of rhetoric not by our actions but the misappropriation of slick  phrases and comparisons to the advantages of 'socialized medicine in a 'new world order' of utopia.

        Few in the arena of proponents of health care reform elaborate on the evils of that system.  There is no reason our system should 'ration' health care.....physicians certainly don't do that unless they are economically coerced to do so.....at the expense of their very financial survival.

       

      Dr  EvanMadianosMD  goes on further,

      "In Ayn Rand's timeless novel Atlas Shrugged, the mysterious hero John Galt is a symbol of the man whose productive energy is withdrawn from the world in protest against living as the despised pawn of the state. But Ayn Rand was aware that the disappearance of the men of talent did not always happen as a deliberate act of protest; it is often just the natural outcome of any system that punishes hard work, ambition, and independent thought, discouraging and demoralizing men with those life-giving qualities. This is what some people have started referring to as "going Galt."

      If we accept such a system in the medical profession, we could find ourselves paging Dr. Galt—and getting no answer. "

       

       
      Design by Free Wordpress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Templates